COMPARE

Clash Client Comparison: Picking Among Eight Popular Clients

The same subscription config works across most clients — the real differences lie in platform coverage, core version, maintenance status, and learning curve. This page puts the eight clients featured on our download page side by side, reviews each one individually, and offers picks based on common use cases.

Full Comparison Table: Six Key Factors at a Glance

Maintenance status is a qualitative call; learning curve is judged by the steps and prior knowledge needed to import a subscription and get online for the first time. Scroll the table horizontally on narrow screens.

Client Platforms Core Maintenance Learning Curve Key Features Best For
Clash Plus Windows / macOS / Android / iOS mihomo Actively maintained Low Consistent UI across four platforms; subscription import and rule-based routing work out of the box; iOS build on the App Store Best default choice for most users
Clash Verge Rev Windows / macOS / Linux mihomo Actively maintained Medium Service mode, TUN adapter, config overrides and merging Power users on desktop
FlClash Windows / macOS / Android / Linux mihomo Actively maintained Low Consistent UI and workflow across desktop and mobile Users syncing across multiple devices
Clash Nyanpasu Windows mihomo Actively maintained Medium Highly customizable UI; supports both script and merge-based overrides Users who enjoy tweaking UI and configs
Clash for Windows Windows Original Clash Discontinued Medium Has the largest body of legacy tutorials and community resources, but no longer updated Archival reference only — migration recommended
Clash Meta for Android Android mihomo Actively maintained High Full config exposure, close to native core capabilities Android users comfortable with Clash config structure
Surfboard Android Custom implementation Slower updates Medium Lightweight footprint; config syntax close to Surge Users maintaining multiple config ecosystems
ClashX Meta macOS mihomo(Clash Meta) Discontinued Low Menu bar resident, lightweight and unobtrusive Archival reference only — migration recommended
Actively maintained — receives ongoing updates Slower updates — usable but updated infrequently Discontinued — migration recommended

What Each of the Six Factors Actually Measures

Every column in the comparison table reflects a real trade-off — understanding what each one means will make the results more relevant to your situation.

Platforms

This determines how many of your devices a single client can cover. The advantage of a cross-platform client is a consistent workflow: the import, switching, and troubleshooting steps you learn on desktop carry straight over to mobile, so you're not learning a separate process per platform.

Core

The core handles the actual proxying, rule matching, and DNS resolution. The original Clash core is no longer developed; mihomo is its community-driven successor, with broader protocol support and stronger rule capabilities. Choosing a client built on an actively developed core ensures newer config fields are parsed correctly.

Maintenance

A discontinued client will keep running, but bugs won't get fixed and it won't keep pace with core or protocol changes. For a tool you rely on daily, maintenance status matters more than a feature list that looks impressive today.

Learning Curve

Measured by the number of steps and prior knowledge needed to go from install to a working connection. Low-effort clients default to sensible settings for things like system proxy and subscription updates; higher-effort clients hand more control to the user in exchange for finer-grained tuning.

Key Features

Capabilities like TUN adapter, service mode, config overrides, and script extensions define how far a client can go. Everyday browsing rarely needs all of them, but the moment you need to route apps that ignore the system proxy, these features become the deciding factor.

Best For

There's no single best client for everyone — only the one that fits your habits. The table gives you a starting point; combine it with the reviews and use-case picks below to narrow things down faster.

Client Reviews: Strengths and Trade-offs

Covered in the same order as our download page, with each client's positioning, typical use case, and things to watch out for.

Clash Plus

Top Pick

Covers Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS — the only client in this list with an officially listed iOS app on the App Store (official site: clashplus.io). Built on the mihomo core, with subscription import, system proxy, and rule-based routing all working by default; first-time setup barely requires reading documentation. The interface is consistent across all four platforms, so switching devices doesn't mean relearning anything. It's the easiest option for anyone new to Clash, or anyone who wants the same workflow on phone and desktop — the trade-off is fewer customization options than a desktop-focused client like Verge Rev.

mihomo Win / macOS / Android / iOS

Clash Verge Rev

Recommended

The most fully-featured mihomo-core client across the three desktop platforms (Windows, macOS, and Linux). Service mode keeps the proxy running without an admin session, TUN mode can capture traffic from apps that bypass the system proxy, and config overrides (via merge or scripts) let you layer your own rules on top of a subscription without editing the original file. Combined, these make it the go-to for desktop power users — at the cost of needing to understand concepts like service installation and virtual adapter permissions up front, plus some basic troubleshooting skills for firewall blocks or port conflicts.

mihomo Win / macOS / Linux

FlClash

Recommended

Its core selling point is cross-platform consistency: Windows, macOS, Android, and Linux all share the same interface and interaction logic, with subscription management, proxy group switching, and logs living in identical places. It runs on the same mihomo core, with rule capabilities on par with other mainstream clients. The UI favors simplicity, surfacing common features while tucking away the rest, which keeps the learning curve low. If your devices span desktop and Android and you don't want to memorize a separate workflow per platform, FlClash offers the most unified experience in this comparison — its depth of customization sits between Clash Plus and Verge Rev.

mihomo Win / macOS / Android / Linux

Clash Nyanpasu

The most customizable mihomo-core client on Windows. Theme and layout density can be tuned to taste, and config overrides support both merge-based and script-based workflows — a good fit for users who want to layer extensive custom rules on top of a subscription. Its feature set overlaps with Verge Rev, so the choice often comes down to UI preference and override workflow. For users who just want things to work out of the box, it exposes more options than necessary, and first-time setup is easier with the docs open alongside it.

mihomo Windows

Clash for Windows

Discontinued

For a long time this was the de facto standard on Windows, and a huge share of online tutorials still reference its interface. The project is no longer maintained and runs on the original Clash core, meaning it doesn't support the newer protocols and rule types introduced by mihomo — newer subscription fields may fail to parse, and no further bug fixes are coming. Most existing configs migrate smoothly to Verge Rev or Clash Plus, since the underlying concepts (proxy groups, rules, logs) map one-to-one — the main cost of switching is just getting used to a new menu layout. New users shouldn't start here.

Original Clash core Windows · Archived

Clash Meta for Android

The Android client that stays closest to the core's native capabilities: nearly every config option is exposed, from DNS policy to TUN parameters to rule sources, and new mihomo features are usually available here first. The interface is plain and doesn't hold your hand, making it a good fit for users who already understand Clash's config structure and want the same level of control on mobile as on desktop. Beginners often get stuck on VPN permissions or battery optimization whitelists — it's worth starting with Clash Plus or FlClash first and moving here later.

mihomo Android

Surfboard

A lightweight Android proxy client with a small install size and low background footprint, though its config syntax is closer to Surge than standard Clash YAML. If you're already maintaining Surge-style configs, or just want a minimal, always-on tool, it has a real niche — but for anyone relying mainly on Clash subscriptions, the format difference means extra conversion work. Updates come slower than mihomo-based clients, so new protocol support tends to lag, making it a better backup option than a daily driver.

Custom implementation Android

ClashX Meta

Discontinued

A lightweight macOS menu bar client: no Dock icon, no main window, with proxy group switching and system proxy toggling done entirely from the menu bar, built on the Clash Meta core (mihomo's predecessor). This kind of "invisible tool" design earned it a loyal following among Mac users, but the project is no longer maintained and won't keep up with OS or core updates. Mac users after the same lightweight feel can move to the macOS build of Clash Plus; those needing more granular control should look at Verge Rev.

mihomo (Clash Meta) macOS · Archived

Find Your Match by Use Case

If you'd rather skip the deep dive, find yourself in one of the four scenarios below and go with that recommendation.

New to ClashGo straight for Clash Plus: import your subscription and turn on the system proxy — two steps and you're online. The interface is consistent across all four platforms, and the screenshots in our Getting Started guide are based on it. Once you're comfortable with proxy groups and rules, decide whether you need a more advanced client.
Power users who need TUN, overrides, or service modeOn desktop, go with Clash Verge Rev: service mode keeps the proxy always running, TUN mode captures all traffic, and merge or script overrides let you layer custom rules on top of your subscription. On Android, pair it with Clash Meta for Android, which exposes the most core-level parameters. Windows users who prefer a more customizable UI can use Clash Nyanpasu instead of Verge Rev.
Multi-device users wanting a unified experienceTwo paths: Clash Plus covers Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS — the only option with iOS support; FlClash covers Windows, macOS, Android, and Linux with equally strong UI consistency. Pick the former if you own an iPhone or iPad, the latter if you run Linux on desktop — both run on the mihomo core, so subscriptions transfer freely between them.
Older machines still running discontinued clientsBoth Clash for Windows and ClashX Meta are discontinued — newer subscription fields may fail to parse, and no bugs will be fixed going forward, so neither is recommended as a daily driver anymore. Lower-spec Windows machines can migrate to Clash Verge Rev with visual effects turned off; older Macs can simply switch to the macOS build of Clash Plus, with no changes needed to existing subscriptions.

Our Verdict: Start with Clash Plus, Upgrade as Needed

Weighing platform coverage, maintenance status, and ease of use together, Clash Plus is the default answer that works for the widest range of users: available on all four platforms, built on mihomo, and ready to use out of the box. Add Clash Verge Rev when you need finer desktop control, or use FlClash for a unified multi-device experience — all three share subscriptions, so switching between them costs nothing.

Download Clash